Re: progreloc.c - what module?

Ben Pfaff wrote: > It seems that what is left is: > > - Prepare a gnulib module that encapsulates the lib and > m4 files that are needed and makes the proper Autoconf > calls. > > - Adding support to Automake to avoid the need to add or > modify rules

Re: progreloc.c - what module?

Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Pfaff wrote: >> The file lib/progreloc.c is not in any module (as far as I can >> tell). > > Yes [1]. This "relocatable" stuff is in a temporary state. Ideally it should > be integrated into autoconf and au

Re: progreloc.c - what module?

On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:27:26PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Ben Pfaff wrote: > > The file lib/progreloc.c is not in any module (as far as I can > > tell). > > Yes [1]. This "relocatable" stuff is in a temporary state. Ideally it should > be integrated into

Re: progreloc.c - what module?

Ben Pfaff wrote: > The file lib/progreloc.c is not in any module (as far as I can > tell). Yes [1]. This "relocatable" stuff is in a temporary state. Ideally it should be integrated into autoconf and automake. Do you have time to work on that with me? Bruno [1] http://lists

Re: progreloc.c - what module?

Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The file lib/progreloc.c is not in any module (as far as I can > tell). Also, there is no header file that prototypes its > functions. Is this intentional? The latter I've now noticed I'm wrong about, but I'm still prett

progreloc.c - what module?

The file lib/progreloc.c is not in any module (as far as I can tell). Also, there is no header file that prototypes its functions. Is this intentional? -- Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://benpfaff.org

Re: progreloc.c

Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-11/msg00054.html > > Relevant to recent discussion about LGPL modules depending on GPL > ones, this file has no module so was missed during that discussion. > The message above sent last week provides a

Re: progreloc.c

Charles Wilson wrote: The file lib/progreloc.c has no module, and carries an embedded GPL license. However, the intent for this file is that it is LGPL, according to the check-in message for revision 1.5, here: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnulib/gnulib/lib/progreloc.c?rev=1.10&

progreloc.c

The file lib/progreloc.c has no module, and carries an embedded GPL license. However, the intent for this file is that it is LGPL, according to the check-in message for revision 1.5, here: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnulib/gnulib/lib/progreloc.c?rev=1.10&view=log "Change

update progreloc.c

Merge from gettext. 2006-05-17 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cygwin portability. * progreloc.c (WIN32_NATIVE): Renamed from WIN32. 2006-04-30 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * progreloc.c: Include if available. (find_exec

Re: HAVE_UNISTD_H used in progreloc.c

Hi Jim, > I just grepped for HAVE_UNISTD_H in gnulib/ and found this > single remaining use. Any reason to keep it? > > Index: lib/progreloc.c Yes. Mingw doesn't have a . gnulib provides an empty replacement; however, the relocatable stuff is only temporarily in gnulib - ulti

HAVE_UNISTD_H used in progreloc.c

Hi Bruno, I just grepped for HAVE_UNISTD_H in gnulib/ and found this single remaining use. Any reason to keep it? Index: lib/progreloc.c === RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/lib/progreloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p