Bruno Haible wrote:
> Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> > gllig/printf.o is not, but does not contain rpl_printf:
> > $ nm -Pe gllib/printf.o
> > E __stdio_fp
> > F printf
> > E rpl_vfprintf
>
> gllib/printf.o should define rpl_printf, not printf.
I'm also observing this error o
Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> gllig/printf.o is not, but does not contain rpl_printf:
> $ nm -Pe gllib/printf.o
> E __stdio_fp
> F printf
> E rpl_vfprintf
gllib/printf.o should define rpl_printf, not printf.
Is some header file on your platform doing a "#undef printf" ?
Bru
23, 2010 1:52 PM
To: Joachim Schmitz
Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Subject: Re: printf.o HP-NonStop
Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> rpl_printf missing (during linking) (and an empty .o file created)
> ERROR [1210]:
>test-stdio-c++.o (.rodata + 0x10): unresolved reference to rpl_printf.
Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> rpl_printf missing (during linking) (and an empty .o file created)
> ERROR [1210]:
> test-stdio-c++.o (.rodata + 0x10): unresolved reference to rpl_printf.
Hmm, an empty .o file indicates some other kind of error. Is it
reproducible when you try to build print
