Paul Eggert writes:
> On 05/01/11 11:21, J.T. Conklin wrote:
>> should the parse-datetime.texi documentation
>> be changed to remove the "tr"; to remove the --iso-8601 example; or to
>> change it from --iso-8601 to --rfc-3339 (which also does not need the
>> "tr"); or would something else be more
On 05/01/11 11:21, J.T. Conklin wrote:
> should the parse-datetime.texi documentation
> be changed to remove the "tr"; to remove the --iso-8601 example; or to
> change it from --iso-8601 to --rfc-3339 (which also does not need the
> "tr"); or would something else be more appropriate
I'd suggest --
While waiting for assignment paperwork, I'm looking into what changes
to the documentation and testsuite that will be needed to complete my
parse-datetime.y change.
In doc/parse-datetime.texi, I found a reference to the date command's
--iso-8601 option in the section that explains its output may n
