On 15/10/23 11:59, Bruno Haible wrote:
> With the new benchmark in place, I measured the run time of
> - the glibc 2.35 implementation of totalorder,
> - the gnulib implementation (picked by configuring with
> gl_cv_func_totalorder_in_libm=no gl_cv_func_totalorder_no_libm=no \
>
With the new benchmark in place, I measured the run time of
- the glibc 2.35 implementation of totalorder,
- the gnulib implementation (picked by configuring with
gl_cv_func_totalorder_in_libm=no gl_cv_func_totalorder_no_libm=no \
gl_cv_func_totalorderf_in_libm=no gl_cv_func_totalor
