Bruno Haible wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> We could also check at configure time for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([mode_t]), then
>> use the preprocessor to skip the unneeded branch altogether using the
>> appropriate macro from config.h.
>
> Yes. Paul Eggert tried to avoid configure-time checks that could also
Eric Blake wrote:
> We could also check at configure time for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([mode_t]), then
> use the preprocessor to skip the unneeded branch altogether using the
> appropriate macro from config.h.
Yes. Paul Eggert tried to avoid configure-time checks that could also be done
at compile-time. Bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 5/20/2009 5:08 PM:
> You can ignore this warning. The code is fine.
>
> We know no way of getting rid of this warning, except by passing fewer warning
> options to gcc.
We could also check at configure time for AC_CHECK_S
Eric Blake ha escrit:
> In earlier versions of POSIX, the intent was that mode_t could
> be narrower than int, and that all programmers had to use only symbolic
> constants in that argument.
As a side note, on that particular architecture, mode_t is indeed
narrower than int.
Regards,
Sergey
Bruno Haible ha escrit:
> You can ignore this warning. The code is fine.
Ah, OK. Thank you. Perhaps it merits mentioning in the docs,
to avoid further reports of this kind?
Regards,
Sergey
Eric Blake writes:
> In earlier versions of POSIX, the intent was that mode_t could
> be narrower than int, and that all programmers had to use only symbolic
> constants in that argument. But POSIX 2008 changed its stance by adding
> these words:
>
> The header shall define the following symbol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 5/20/2009 5:08 PM:
> Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
>> When trying to compile open-safer.c on amd64 I get:
>>
>> open-safer.c: In function 'open_safer':
>> open-safer.c:46: warning: 'mode_t' is promoted to 'int' when passed throu
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> When trying to compile open-safer.c on amd64 I get:
>
> open-safer.c: In function 'open_safer':
> open-safer.c:46: warning: 'mode_t' is promoted to 'int' when passed through
> '...'
> open-safer.c:46: warning: (so you should pass 'int' not 'mode_t' to 'va_arg')
> open-s
Hello,
When trying to compile open-safer.c on amd64 I get:
open-safer.c: In function 'open_safer':
open-safer.c:46: warning: 'mode_t' is promoted to 'int' when passed
through '...'
open-safer.c:46: warning: (so you should pass 'int' not 'mode_t' to
'va_arg')
open-safer.c:46: note: if this code is
