Re: nproc -> LGPL

2010-12-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Bruno Haible writes: > Glen Lenker wrote: >> > Glen, do you also agree with Ludo's request? >> >> It is fine with me; nproc is quite libraryish. > > OK, I've pushed the license change. Great, thanks! Ludo’.

Re: nproc -> LGPL

2010-12-04 Thread Bruno Haible
Glen Lenker wrote: > > Glen, do you also agree with Ludo's request? > > It is fine with me; nproc is quite libraryish. OK, I've pushed the license change. Bruno

nproc -> LGPL

2010-12-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! I’d like to use ‘nproc’ in libguile, which is LGPLv3+. Could you change the license accordingly? Thanks, Ludo’.

Re: nproc -> LGPL

2010-12-02 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > I’d like to use ‘nproc’ in libguile, which is LGPLv3+. Could you change > > the license accordingly? > > nproc does feel quite libraryish and it'd be fine with me. Yes, nproc is libraryish, comparable to parts of the contents of libgomp. Therefore it's fine with me too. I

Re: nproc -> LGPL

2010-12-02 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/02/10 12:13, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I’d like to use ‘nproc’ in libguile, which is LGPLv3+. Could you change > the license accordingly? nproc does feel quite libraryish and it'd be fine with me. Bruno has contributed the most to it lately, though, and I'd value his opinion.