Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder, how GNU's getopt implementation, where flags' arguments can be
> optional, deals with the cases of such an option followed by something, that
> begins with a dash itself:
>
> m4 -d -X
It's the same way that (for example) 'pr -e' work
> = > Finally, does m4 actually use/document the short-options usage, that's
> = > affected by the POSIX vs. GNU differences in getopt()?
> =
> = Yes, the info documentation for m4's -d discusses the ramifications of
> its
> = argument being optional (and if that text is not clear enough for you,
On Thursday 21 September 2006 09:36, Eric Blake wrote:
= > Finally, does m4 actually use/document the short-options usage, that's
= > affected by the POSIX vs. GNU differences in getopt()?
=
= Yes, the info documentation for m4's -d discusses the ramifications of its
= argument being optional (and
