> 2012-02-29 Bruno Haible
>
> New module 'cbrtl'.
> * lib/math.in.h (cbrtl): New declaration.
> * lib/cbrtl.c: New file.
> * m4/cbrtl.m4: New file.
> * m4/math_h.m4 (gl_MATH_H): Test whether cbrtl is declared.
> (gl_MATH_H_
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > cbrtf(-0.0) = -Inf(ouch!!)
> > cbrtl(-0.0) = +0.0
> >
> > The patches are similar; here's the second one.
>
> I suppose the one for cbrtf does not add an -ieee variant?
Indeed, the documentation in doc/posix-functions/cbrtf.texi does
not mention a 'cbrtf-ieee' mo
Il 01/03/2012 04:56, Bruno Haible ha scritto:
> The IEEE tests show that on IRIX 6.5
> cbrtf(-0.0) = -Inf(ouch!!)
> cbrtl(-0.0) = +0.0
>
> The patches are similar; here's the second one.
I suppose the one for cbrtf does not add an -ieee variant?
Paolo
> 2012-02-29 Bruno Haible
>
> New module 'cbrtl'.
The IEEE tests show that on IRIX 6.5
cbrtf(-0.0) = -Inf(ouch!!)
cbrtl(-0.0) = +0.0
The patches are similar; here's the second one.
2012-02-29 Bruno Haible
cbrtl-ieee: Work around
Here is a new module that provides the cbrtl() function.
2012-02-29 Bruno Haible
New module 'cbrtl'.
* lib/math.in.h (cbrtl): New declaration.
* lib/cbrtl.c: New file.
* m4/cbrtl.m4: New file.
* m4/math_h.m4 (gl_MATH_H): Test whether cbrtl i
