Rich Felker wrote:
> > checking whether printf supports the 'ls' directive... no
>
> Yep, I caught this one a while back. It's fixed in git.
Good to hear that.
Bruno
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Rich Felker wrote:
> > considering printf broken, and replacing printf
> > because of this, is a big issue. Replacing printf is non-trivial
>
> There is also another test that causes musl's printf to be overridden:
>
> checking whe
Rich Felker wrote:
> considering printf broken, and replacing printf
> because of this, is a big issue. Replacing printf is non-trivial
There is also another test that causes musl's printf to be overridden:
checking whether printf supports the 'ls' directive... no
The test program exited with
