Re: mkdir module license

Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mardi 29 avril 2008 à 13:16 +0200, Jim Meyering a écrit : >> Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Le lundi 28 avril 2008 à 22:40 +0200, Jim Meyering a écrit : >> >> Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Le samed

Re: mkdir module license

Le mardi 29 avril 2008 à 13:16 +0200, Jim Meyering a écrit : > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le lundi 28 avril 2008 à 22:40 +0200, Jim Meyering a écrit : > >> Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 02:31 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : >

Re: mkdir module license

Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le lundi 28 avril 2008 à 22:40 +0200, Jim Meyering a écrit : >> Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 02:31 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : >> >> Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: >> >> > I guess mkdir could use the

Re: mkdir module license

Le lundi 28 avril 2008 à 22:40 +0200, Jim Meyering a écrit : > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 02:31 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : > >> Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > >> > I guess mkdir could use the original malloc implementation, returning an > >> > er

Re: mkdir module license

Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 02:31 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : >> Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: >> > I guess mkdir could use the original malloc implementation, returning an >> > error on allocation failure. Or is that a problem? >> >> Sounds ok to me:

Re: mkdir module license

Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 02:31 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : > Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > I guess mkdir could use the original malloc implementation, returning an > > error on allocation failure. Or is that a problem? > > Sounds ok to me: There is no reason why a system call replacement like

Re: mkdir module license

Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > I guess mkdir could use the original malloc implementation, returning an > error on allocation failure. Or is that a problem? Sounds ok to me: There is no reason why a system call replacement like mkdir() should not report its allocation failures through -1/ENOMEM. Ca

Re: mkdir module license

Le jeudi 24 avril 2008 à 13:31 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : > Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > Would relicensing the mkdir module and it's dependencies from GPL to > > LGPL be envisageable? > > > > We would like to use this module from the Prelude library. > > Among these dependencies there is '

Re: mkdir module license

Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > Would relicensing the mkdir module and it's dependencies from GPL to > LGPL be envisageable? > > We would like to use this module from the Prelude library. Among these dependencies there is 'xalloc'. Which means that a a failure in a function of the Prelude library

mkdir module license

Hi, Would relicensing the mkdir module and it's dependencies from GPL to LGPL be envisageable? We would like to use this module from the Prelude library. Thanks! -- Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>