PGP signatures [was: missing dependency in *printf]

2007-04-26 Thread Eric Blake
According to Simon Josefsson on 4/3/2007 4:22 AM: > "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> Please either, indent patches so that gpg doesn't escape leading '-' >> signs, or use S/MIME for attaching as separate gpg signature. > > I think you meant PGP/MIME (RFC3156), S/M

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-04 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > It appears you forgot to commit this? Yes. Done now. > > Depends-on: > > math > > + fpucw > > And is there any reason you are undoing the alphabetic sort, other than that > is > what the file used to have before my patch? Yes, keeping the natural order makes it easier

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Blake
Bruno Haible clisp.org> writes: > > * modules/printf-frexpl (Depends-on): Depend on ldexpl. > > Thanks for the quick fix. But this is overkill: the module 'ldexpl' looks > for the ldexpl() function also in libm, and printf-frexpl doesn't this test > result. > > 2007-04-03 Bruno Haible cl

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -I. -I../../gnu -I../intl -g2 -Wall > -Werror -MT ldexpl.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ldexpl.Tpo -c ../../gnu/ldexpl.c > -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/ldexpl.o > ../../gnu/ldexpl.c:29:20: isnanl.h: No such file or directory > ... > make[3]: *** [ldexpl.lo

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > In trying to use sprintf-posix in m4, I came across this: > > cd .. && /bin/sh /home/eblake/m4-head/ltdl/config/missing --run autoconf > configure:25505: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_FUNC_LDEXPL_WORKS > If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-03 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Simon, On 3 Apr 2007, at 11:22, Simon Josefsson wrote: "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Please either, indent patches so that gpg doesn't escape leading '-' signs, or use S/MIME for attaching as separate gpg signature. I think you meant PGP/MIME (RFC3156), S/MIME doesn't use P

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-03 Thread Simon Josefsson
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Eric, > > Please either, indent patches so that gpg doesn't escape leading '-' > signs, or use S/MIME for attaching as separate gpg signature. I think you meant PGP/MIME (RFC3156), S/MIME doesn't use PGP at all, but yes, I agree with the suggesti

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-03 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Eric, Please either, indent patches so that gpg doesn't escape leading '-' signs, or use S/MIME for attaching as separate gpg signature. Either would allow feeding a saved copy of emails containing a diff to GNU patch (which copes well with consistent indentation) On 3 Apr 2007, at 04

Re: missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-02 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 4/2/2007 9:34 PM: > In trying to use sprintf-posix in m4, I came across this: > > cd .. && /bin/sh /home/eblake/m4-head/ltdl/config/missing --run autoconf > configure:25505: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_FUNC_LDEXPL_WO

missing dependency in *printf

2007-04-02 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In trying to use sprintf-posix in m4, I came across this: cd .. && /bin/sh /home/eblake/m4-head/ltdl/config/missing --run autoconf configure:25505: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_FUNC_LDEXPL_WORKS If this token and others are legitimate, pl