Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that it is a bug to attach the nonnull attribute to
> memcmp parameters (for the very reason that a compare of 0
> bytes should not dereference the pointer, so passing NULL is
> not necessarily a bug).
I am not sure that passing a null pointer to m
Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
> > It's good habit to include the tests from the autoconf macro also in the
test
> > suite (to verify that the autoconf macro actually did its job). So I added
this:
> >
> >
> > 2008-05-20 Bruno Haible clisp.org>
> >
> > * tests/test-memcmp.c (main
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> The first part of this was adding a self-test for memcmp.
>> I'm sure it can be improved to test more corner cases, but this is much
>> better than nothing. Pushed.
>
> It's good habit to include the tests from the autoconf macr
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> The first part of this was adding a self-test for memcmp.
> I'm sure it can be improved to test more corner cases, but this is much
> better than nothing. Pushed.
It's good habit to include the tests from the autoconf macro also in the test
suite (to verify that the autoc
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> MinGW apparently needs gnulib's memcmp module
>
> That was rather surprising to me, so I started investigating why that is
> the case.
The reason was that Autoconf's AC_FUNC_MEMCMP uses AC_RUN_IFELSE wi
e corner cases, but this is much
better than nothing. Pushed.
/Simon
>From f57b1e96a2f83183073b34a05890aa4875708301 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 09:22:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add memcmp-tests module.
---
ChangeLog
