Eric Blake wrote:
> the autoconf macro it replaces is obsolete as of
> autoconf 2.61, and since no modules/* files refer to it?
... and it has been removed in gettext-0.15, more than one year ago.
I'm removing it. Thanks for the reminder.
Bruno
Bruno,
Any reason to keep the file m4/isc-posix.m4 in gnulib, since the platform it
targets is unsupported, the autoconf macro it replaces is obsolete as of
autoconf 2.61, and since no modules/* files refer to it? The clincher is that
the file itself has a comment to "remove it in
Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> I will remove it in gettext-0.15.1. It will still be present in
>>> gettext-0.15.
>> What does this mean for GNULIB? Should I remove it?
>
> Generally, gnulib just mirrors the latest stable gettext version.
> Occasionally Br
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I will remove it in gettext-0.15.1. It will still be present in
>> gettext-0.15.
>
> What does this mean for GNULIB? Should I remove it?
Generally, gnulib just mirrors the latest stable gettext version.
Occasionally Bruno will make exceptions but I
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Derek R. Price wrote:
>> I found this note in m4/isc-posix.m4:
>>
>> # This file is not needed with autoconf-2.53 and newer. Remove it in 2005.
>>
>> The Autoconf 2.60 also marks AC_ISC_POSIX as obsolescent.
>
> I will remove it in g
Derek R. Price wrote:
> I found this note in m4/isc-posix.m4:
>
> # This file is not needed with autoconf-2.53 and newer. Remove it in 2005.
>
> The Autoconf 2.60 also marks AC_ISC_POSIX as obsolescent.
I will remove it in gettext-0.15.1. It will still be present in
gettext-0.15.
Bruno
I found this note in m4/isc-posix.m4:
# This file is not needed with autoconf-2.53 and newer. Remove it in 2005.
The Autoconf 2.60 also marks AC_ISC_POSIX as obsolescent. I hope you
don't mind, but I didn't bother with a patch. A single line requiring
AC_ISC_POSIX needs to be remov
