Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-25 Thread Jim Meyering
Ondřej Vašík wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] doc: Update suffix regex in version sort > > * doc/coreutils.texi: Reflect current filevercmp regex Thanks! Pushed.

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-25 Thread Ondřej Vašík
Jim Meyering wrote: > Pushed. > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=1721cf06d9 I guess info doc about suffix regex should be updated too... Greetings, Ondrej From 88ebd00c46668f2b677c8da9a7e40584d5b97d9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Va

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-24 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Tuesday 24 of March 2009 22:15:59 Jim Meyering wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: > > Kamil Dudka wrote: > >> From d889021cebb7bf798d1b7bf24149c354627e9553 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Kamil Dudka > >> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:20:12 +0100 > >> Subject: [PATCH] filevercmp: extension for simple

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: > Kamil Dudka wrote: >> From d889021cebb7bf798d1b7bf24149c354627e9553 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Kamil Dudka >> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:20:12 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] filevercmp: extension for simple and numbered backups > > Hi Kamil, > > Thanks again. > Complete patc

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Kamil Dudka wrote: > From d889021cebb7bf798d1b7bf24149c354627e9553 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kamil Dudka > Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:20:12 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] filevercmp: extension for simple and numbered backups Hi Kamil, Thanks again. Complete patch below. I'm merging this incremen

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-23 Thread Bob Proulx
Kamil Dudka wrote: > Kamil Dudka wrote: > > I'll look at it deeper next week and check if the new regex works in all > > cases. > > The Debian's backport suffix "~bpo${debian_release}+${build_int}" seems to > be safe in the context of this patch. Thanks to the '+' it can be never > matched as a f

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-23 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Saturday 21 March 2009 00:03:30 Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Friday 20 of March 2009 22:25:30 Bob Proulx wrote: > > The '~' is often used in package version numbers. It sorts before the > > version without it. For example the rule[1] for generating a stable > > backport from the latest unstable ver

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-20 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Friday 20 of March 2009 22:25:30 Bob Proulx wrote: > Kamil Dudka wrote: > > On Friday 20 of March 2009 12:36:38 Bruno Haible wrote: > > > Jim Meyering wrote: > > > > Perhaps "~" isn't the only character we should treat that way. > > > > > > I'd say that '~' is pretty special here because it's us

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-20 Thread Bob Proulx
Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Friday 20 of March 2009 12:36:38 Bruno Haible wrote: > > Jim Meyering wrote: > > > Perhaps "~" isn't the only character we should treat that way. > > > > I'd say that '~' is pretty special here because it's used as backup file > > suffix by many text editors. Which is not th

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-20 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Friday 20 of March 2009 12:36:38 Bruno Haible wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: > > Perhaps "~" isn't the only character we should treat that way. > > I'd say that '~' is pretty special here because it's used as backup file > suffix by many text editors. Which is not the case for '_', '-', and > othe

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Jim Meyering wrote: > Perhaps "~" isn't the only character we should treat that way. I'd say that '~' is pretty special here because it's used as backup file suffix by many text editors. Which is not the case for '_', '-', and others. Bruno

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Kamil Dudka wrote: > Simple patch including clarifying test cases is attached. The patch removes two test cases from tests/test-filevercmp.c. I would prefer a patch that only adds test cases, never removes test cases (unless they were really bogus). Bruno

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-20 Thread Jim Meyering
Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Thursday 19 March 2009 11:27:11 Sven Joachim wrote: >> While the ordering of hidden files in "ls -v" seems to be fixed >> now, there are still inconsistencies. Here's what I get in the latest >> snapshot: >> >> , >> >> | LANG=C /usr/local/src/coreutils-7.1.63-8e6a6/src

Re: ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-20 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Thursday 19 March 2009 11:27:11 Sven Joachim wrote: > While the ordering of hidden files in "ls -v" seems to be fixed > now, there are still inconsistencies. Here's what I get in the latest > snapshot: > > , > > | LANG=C /usr/local/src/coreutils-7.1.63-8e6a6/src/ls -alv > | total 0 > | drwx

ls -v is still inconsistent

2009-03-19 Thread Sven Joachim
While the ordering of hidden files in "ls -v" seems to be fixed now, there are still inconsistencies. Here's what I get in the latest snapshot: , | LANG=C /usr/local/src/coreutils-7.1.63-8e6a6/src/ls -alv | total 0 | drwxr-xr-x 2 sven sven 160 Mar 19 11:13 . | drwxrwxrwt 9 root root 200 Mar 1