2009/3/20 Bruno Haible :
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> It specifically states that results are unspecified for
>> other things, like %b, where there could be more bytes than screen
>> columns. Which means we should be free to interpret things in the way
>> that makes the most sense, by interpreting %5b a
Eric Blake wrote:
> It specifically states that results are unspecified for
> other things, like %b, where there could be more bytes than screen
> columns. Which means we should be free to interpret things in the way
> that makes the most sense, by interpreting %5b as five screen columns
> rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 3/19/2009 5:45 AM:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> "The results are unspecified ... or if a minimum field width is
>> specified for any conversion specifier other than C , F , G , or Y ."
>>
>> So I guess the gcc warning is nice if
Eric Blake wrote:
> "The results are unspecified ... or if a minimum field width is
> specified for any conversion specifier other than C , F , G , or Y ."
>
> So I guess the gcc warning is nice if you are being portable to non-GNU
> strftime
And also with GNU strftime, the width feature is useles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[adding bug-gnulib]
According to Stéphane Raimbault on 3/15/2009 5:09 AM:
> Yes, it's a nice and easy solution but I've already tried to use %5b
> without success on my system:
> gcc 4.3.2
> glibc 2.8 (may 2008)
>
> gcc complains
> warning: field wid