On 09/09/11 08:55, Markus Duft wrote:
> On 09/08/11 08:09, Markus Duft wrote:
>> On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
> [snip]
>>>
>>> You need to find out what is wrong about that type on your platform. If
>>> you're lucky, it's only some library functions (like snprintf) which don't
>>> support
On 09/08/11 08:09, Markus Duft wrote:
> On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> You need to find out what is wrong about that type on your platform. If
>> you're lucky, it's only some library functions (like snprintf) which don't
>> support it.
>>
>> Your best starting point should be t
On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Markus Duft wrote:
>> long long double is broken.
>
> You surely mean "long double"? There is no such type as "long long double"
> in C.
>
>> this bites me in the gnulib vasnprintf implementation, which calls snprintf
>> from libc which immediatel
On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Markus Duft wrote:
>> long long double is broken.
>
> You surely mean "long double"? There is no such type as "long long double"
> in C.
right; long long double is too long :)
>
>> this bites me in the gnulib vasnprintf implementation, which cal
Hi,
Markus Duft wrote:
> long long double is broken.
You surely mean "long double"? There is no such type as "long long double"
in C.
> this bites me in the gnulib vasnprintf implementation, which calls snprintf
> from libc which immediately crashes ... :(
gnulib and coreutils code now assume
Hi!
While porting glib to interix, i stumbled over a problem i didn't hit for a
while (and in fact forgot that it existed on interix): long long double is
broken. this bites me in the gnulib vasnprintf implementation, which calls
snprintf from libc which immediately crashes ... :(
i fixed this
