> What do you think? Should libposix be LGPL or GPL?
This seems directly analogous to libc to me, ie, it should be LGPL.
Bruno Haible writes:
> What do you think? Should libposix be LGPL or GPL?
In case that you decide that it should be LGPL, then I give you
permission to relax the license of GPL modules that I have
written to LGPL, as necessary.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
Hi all,
Among the modules that will be part of libposix, i.e. that are listed as
gnulib modules for some POSIX functions or headers, the following are
currently under GPL license:
functions:
acosl
asinl
atanl
cosl
expl
isfinite
logl
sinl
sqrtl
tanl
File system related funct
