Eric Blake wrote:
> This trips a bug in mingw. There, WEOF is defined as 0x, but towlower
> (0x) returns 0x77c5.
This works around it.
2009-09-08 Bruno Haible
Work around towlower, towupper bug on mingw.
* lib/wctype.in.h (towlower, towupper) [__MINGW32__]: New r
Bruno Haible clisp.org> writes:
> + /* Check that the tow* functions map WEOF to WEOF. */
> + ASSERT (towlower (e) == e);
> + ASSERT (towupper (e) == e);
This trips a bug in mingw. There, WEOF is defined as 0x, but towlower
(0x) returns 0x77c5. Oddly enough, towupper(0x) wo
Bruno Haible ha escrit:
> Like Solaris 2.5.1 and IRIX 5.3, you mean? This should do it.
Thanks, Bruno!
Regards,
Sergey
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > nm exclude.o | grep towlower
> > > U _towlower
> > >
> > > And my libc doesn't define towlower() either.
> >
> > I see. Perhaps it is defined elsewhere? Could you please check?
> > The gnulib's wchar.h does not provide a wrapper for it, unfortunately.
>
> Ju
Hi Alan,
> Sorry to ping again, but because coreutils 7.5 has the newer version of
> gnulib it's blocking me from upgrading.
Sorry for the delay: I was busy with other projects. I will provide a
patch during this weekend. Stay in touch.
Regards,
Sergey
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 13:51 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 13:24 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
> >
> > > Yes, but I get this
> > >
> > > nm exclude.o | grep towlower
> > > U _towlower
> > >
> > > And my libc doesn't define towl
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 13:24 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
>
> > Yes, but I get this
> >
> > nm exclude.o | grep towlower
> > U _towlower
> >
> > And my libc doesn't define towlower() either.
>
> I see. Perhaps it is defined elsewhere? Could you pleas
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 13:24 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
>
> > Yes, but I get this
> >
> > nm exclude.o | grep towlower
> > U _towlower
> >
> > And my libc doesn't define towlower() either.
>
> I see. Perhaps it is defined elsewhere? Could you pleas
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 13:24 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
>
> > Yes, but I get this
> >
> > nm exclude.o | grep towlower
> > U _towlower
> >
> > And my libc doesn't define towlower() either.
>
> I see. Perhaps it is defined elsewhere? Could you pleas
Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
> Yes, but I get this
>
> nm exclude.o | grep towlower
> U _towlower
>
> And my libc doesn't define towlower() either.
I see. Perhaps it is defined elsewhere? Could you please check?
The gnulib's wchar.h does not provide a wrapper for it, unfortunately.
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 13:10 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
>
> > exclude.c: In function 'string_hasher_ci':
> > exclude.c:167: warning: implicit declaration of function 'towlower'
> > exclude.c:167: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> > function '
Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
> exclude.c: In function 'string_hasher_ci':
> exclude.c:167: warning: implicit declaration of function 'towlower'
> exclude.c:167: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> function 'towlower'
These are warnings, not errors. What errors do you get? Pleas
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 12:30 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
>
> > Not sure this is right, but it works
>
> Surely it is not right. And it does not work, either: it does
> not correctly lower the case of the input string.
>
> Have you tried the patch I sent?
Your
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 12:30 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
>
> > Not sure this is right, but it works
>
> Surely it is not right. And it does not work, either: it does
> not correctly lower the case of the input string.
>
> Have you tried the patch I sent?
Yike
Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
> Not sure this is right, but it works
Surely it is not right. And it does not work, either: it does
not correctly lower the case of the input string.
Have you tried the patch I sent?
Regards,
Sergey
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 15:24 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> As the subject line says, and I end up with an unresolved symbol.
>
> Not sure what the right definition check to wrap that up in though.
Not sure this is right, but it works
Alan.
diff --git a/lib/exclude.c b/lib/exclude.c
index 32
Alan Hourihane ha escrit:
> As the subject line says, and I end up with an unresolved symbol.
Please try this patch:
diff --git a/lib/exclude.c b/lib/exclude.c
index 32f2a0a..00f3891 100644
--- a/lib/exclude.c
+++ b/lib/exclude.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
As the subject line says, and I end up with an unresolved symbol.
Not sure what the right definition check to wrap that up in though.
Thanks,
Alan.
18 matches
Mail list logo
