Re: levels of Windows support

2017-05-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Would a gnulib-wide option "ignore MSVC portability" be useful for Emacs? > > Yes, most probably, because Emacs no longer supports MSVC builds > (although you might still find traces of that in the sources). OK, so I'm documenting that the existing practice of Emacs (name

Re: levels of Windows support

2017-05-09 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Paul Eggert > Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 14:08:19 -0700 > > I suppose it'd be nicer if Emacs could use the Gnulib versions of the > code instead of having its own version, as that would help Emacs and > other GNU programs share solutions better; but this would require some > hacking and it'

Re: levels of Windows support

2017-05-09 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Bruno Haible > Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 22:17:58 +0200 > > Would a gnulib-wide option "ignore mingw and MSVC portability" be useful for > Emacs? Not as a global option, because the MinGW port of Emacs does use some Gnulib functions. > Would a gnulib-wide option "ignore MSVC portability" b

Re: levels of Windows support

2017-05-09 Thread Paul Eggert
On 05/09/2017 01:17 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: Hi Eli and Paul, I'm trying to understand whether the #ifs you are adding for Emacs could be generalized for gnulib users other than Emacs. On one hand, Eli writes: Emacs dropped MSVC support a few years ago. Only MinGW, with its 2 flavors, is curre

Re: levels of Windows support

2017-05-09 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Eli and Paul, I'm trying to understand whether the #ifs you are adding for Emacs could be generalized for gnulib users other than Emacs. On one hand, Eli writes: > Emacs dropped MSVC support a few years ago. Only MinGW, with its 2 > flavors, is currently supported, in addition to Cygwin. On