Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Wouldn't it be more useful if, instead of listing Linux/x86, the
> glibc version that had this bug was listed (and maybe the GCC
> version used);
It would be useful if there was some hope that glibc be more defensive
against these bit patterns that are outside the IEEE 754
Hello Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 02:11:56PM CEST:
> On mingw, the test-isfinite test failed:
>
> test-isfinite.c:169: assertion failed
> FAIL: test-isfinite.exe
>
> And after adding the same tests as for isnan(long double) - namely, that
> signalling NaNs, pseudo-den
On mingw, the test-isfinite test failed:
test-isfinite.c:169: assertion failed
FAIL: test-isfinite.exe
And after adding the same tests as for isnan(long double) - namely, that
signalling NaNs, pseudo-denormals and the like be considered as NaNs, not as
finite numbers - the test failed also Li
