Re: inconsistency in EILSEQ definition...

2013-01-03 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> I am not sure I understand what you mean. My suggestion was to Joel> have libiconv and gnulib use the same value for EILSEQ. As for Joel> gnulib, it uses an arbitrary value that's fairly large, compared Joel> to typical values, so it should be distinc

Re: inconsistency in EILSEQ definition...

2013-01-02 Thread Joel Brobecker
> That's probably a bug in libiconv - POSIX says that EILSEQ and ENOENT > must be distinct. [...] > > In terms of the build error on Lynx178, what I ended up doing > > was compile with -DEILSEQ=ENOENT. > > This smells wrong, but at least it worked for you, while we figure out > how to fix things p

Re: inconsistency in EILSEQ definition...

2013-01-02 Thread Eric Blake
On 01/02/2013 03:39 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > A few weeks ago, I reported a problem to gnulib where the errno > module would still be missing the EILSEQ macro on systems that > do not define it (in this particular case: LynxOS 178): > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-

inconsistency in EILSEQ definition...

2013-01-02 Thread Joel Brobecker
Hello, A few weeks ago, I reported a problem to gnulib where the errno module would still be missing the EILSEQ macro on systems that do not define it (in this particular case: LynxOS 178): http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-10/msg00088.html The problem was solved by defining EILSE