Re: include_next missing

2007-06-21 Thread Paul Eggert
"Sergey Poznyakoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > following lines in ChangeLog: > > * modules/fcntl (Depends-on): Depend on absolute-header, not > include_next. > * modules/float: Likewise. > * modules/inttypes: Likewise. > ... > > make me doubt whether this w

Re: include_next missing

2007-06-21 Thread Jim Meyering
"Sergey Poznyakoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit: > >> It seems more likely that there should be a new file named >> modules/include_next. If you create it as follows, at least >> coreutils builds once again: > > Yes, that's what I did to bootstrap tar a

Re: include_next missing

2007-06-21 Thread Sergey Poznyakoff
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit: > It seems more likely that there should be a new file named > modules/include_next. If you create it as follows, at least > coreutils builds once again: Yes, that's what I did to bootstrap tar and cpio. Nevertheless, the following lines in ChangeLog:

Re: include_next missing

2007-06-21 Thread Jim Meyering
"Sergey Poznyakoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In modules directory, 17 files depend on include_next, but there is no > module by that name. Judging by the last ChangeLog entry, these > dependencies should have been changed to absolute-header. Am I right? Hi Sergey, It seems more likely that th

include_next missing

2007-06-21 Thread Sergey Poznyakoff
In modules directory, 17 files depend on include_next, but there is no module by that name. Judging by the last ChangeLog entry, these dependencies should have been changed to absolute-header. Am I right? Regards, Sergey