Re: gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-27 Thread Bruno Haible
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > > >gnulib-1836.86a37.1.1 > > > > If you do this, you can never again switch to a different versioning > > scheme. > > Not quite so. What I meant is that the part between `-' and `1.1' is > to be ignored (it cannot be used for ordering anyway). Does this match what

Re: gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-27 Thread Sergey Poznyakoff
Bruno Haible ha escrit: > >gnulib-1836.86a37.1.1 > > If you do this, you can never again switch to a different versioning > scheme. Not quite so. What I meant is that the part between `-' and `1.1' is to be ignored (it cannot be used for ordering anyway). In this case I see no difficulty in

Re: gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-26 Thread Bruno Haible
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > It would be better to place "TP version" at the end, as in: > >gnulib-1836.86a37.1.1 If you do this, you can never again switch to a different versioning scheme. What if we abandon 'git' for something better in 5 years? Then all major versions will have to be > 5000

Re: gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-26 Thread Sergey Poznyakoff
Bruno Haible ha escrit: > How about changing the versioning scheme to > gnulib-1.1.2009.03.26 > or > gnulib-1.1.1836.86a37 It would be better to place "TP version" at the end, as in: gnulib-1836.86a37.1.1 This should work with the TP software. > Could you also generate and publish a

Re: gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-26 Thread Bruno Haible
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > the TP robot assumes that version numbers are growing > from version to version and relies on this for sorting. Given > this, I'll continue using the old numbering scheme for potfiles > (gnulib-major.minor.pot), but before submitting the potfile, I'll create > a tag TP-ma

Re: gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-26 Thread Sergey Poznyakoff
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > I am going to submit the updated gnulib.pot to TP. Before this, > I'd like to change its versioning scheme so that it coincides with the > version reported by `gnilib-tool --version'. E.g. this potfile will be > named gnulib-0.0.1991-dbebf.pot. After discussing this w

Re: gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-20 Thread Jim Meyering
Hi Sergey, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > I am going to submit the updated gnulib.pot to TP. Before this, > I'd like to change its versioning scheme so that it coincides with the > version reported by `gnilib-tool --version'. E.g. this potfile will be > named gnulib-0.0.1991-dbebf.pot. Does it seem

gnulib.pot versioning scheme

2009-03-20 Thread Sergey Poznyakoff
Hello, I am going to submit the updated gnulib.pot to TP. Before this, I'd like to change its versioning scheme so that it coincides with the version reported by `gnilib-tool --version'. E.g. this potfile will be named gnulib-0.0.1991-dbebf.pot. Does it seem a good idea? Regards, Sergey