On 5 March 2010 00:09, Karl Berry wrote:
> Here's my attempt at describing the third "mixed" approach to Gnulib
> sources. Is it ok?
>
>
> @node VCS Issues
> @section Issues with Version Control Systems
>
> If a project stores its source files in a version control system (VCS),
> such as CVS, Sub
Here's my attempt at describing the third "mixed" approach to Gnulib
sources. Is it ok?
@node VCS Issues
@section Issues with Version Control Systems
If a project stores its source files in a version control system (VCS),
such as CVS, Subversion, or Git, one needs to decide which files to commi
Hi,
Simon Josefsson writes:
> k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes:
>
>> What I mean - I wouldn't mind commiting gnulib stuff to VCS, but only
>> if I can omit files generated by autoreconf.
>>
>> FWIW, that is exactly what I do for Texinfo. It helps my contributors
>> to not spend
k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes:
> What I mean - I wouldn't mind commiting gnulib stuff to VCS, but only
> if I can omit files generated by autoreconf.
>
> FWIW, that is exactly what I do for Texinfo. It helps my contributors
> to not spend time dealing with gnulib, and it helps
What I mean - I wouldn't mind commiting gnulib stuff to VCS, but only
if I can omit files generated by autoreconf.
FWIW, that is exactly what I do for Texinfo. It helps my contributors
to not spend time dealing with gnulib, and it helps me because it avoids
gnulib-skew differences between
On 23 February 2010 00:34, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hello Matěj,
>
> (how do you pronounce your name? like Matyesh?)
This one is quite difficult for English speaking people :-)
I have found this one on the web and it is quite accurate:
Approx English pronunciation for Matej: M as in "me (M.IY)" ; AA
Hello Matěj,
(how do you pronounce your name? like Matyesh?)
> The script solution you have proposed does the job, but I hate when the
> autogen.sh file has more than, let's say, ten lines.
Well, the autogen.sh script has more to do if you omit more files from
version control. An autogen.sh scr
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 23:43 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Matěj Týč wrote:
> > What I don't like about the second solution is the necessity of having
> > gnulib-tool available. ...
> > ... should be performed manually from the gnulib git.
> > You surely can imagine that the difficulty of t
Hi,
Matěj Týč wrote:
> What I don't like about the second solution is the necessity of having
> gnulib-tool available. ...
> ... should be performed manually from the gnulib git.
> You surely can imagine that the difficulty of the build process would
> increase because of this.
Well, "manually" d
Hello,
I can't help myself, but I am not satisfied with the current choice of
methods how to install a gnulib module (with respect to version control
systmes)?
AFAIK from the manual, there are two possible ways:
- Either one commits everyhing to the repository (I don't like that
since it i
10 matches
Mail list logo
