Paul Eggert wrote:
> * MODULES.html.sh: Move 'assert' into the assert section.
> Move 'dummy' into the linking section.
> Remove ullong_max.
> Add section for compatibility checks for POSIX:2001 functions,
> and put d-ino, d-type, link-follow, rmdir-errno, unlink-busy,
"Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe that the new openat module needs to depend on lchown.
Yes, thanks for noting that. I installed your patch.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
I believe that the new openat module needs to depend on lchown.
I updated CVS and it didn't pull in the lchown module which lead
to a build-break on BSDI BSD/OS.
Index: modules/openat
=
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I installed the following almost-but-not-quite-mechanical
> change to do that for all the modules that Jim or I help maintain.
Thanks a lot! With this, I could remove 5 .diff overrides from gettext's
gnulib-local.
> The error and obstack modules are a special case because Aut
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, please go ahead.
OK, thanks, I installed this.
2006-08-22 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Avoid the need for AC_LIBSOURCES in m4 macros.
* modules/arcfour (EXTRA_DIST): Add arcfour.h.
* modules/arctwo (EXTRA_DIST): Add
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also: Simon, would you object to similar changes for the following m4
> files? They're the only ones remaining that have the problem.
>
> arcfour arctwo check-version crc des gc getdelim getline hmac-md5
> hmac-sha1 md2 md4 read-file readline rijndael
No
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Is this as simple as removing the AC_SOURCES lines in the .m4 files,
> and replacing them with Files: lines in the modules file
It's as simple as removing the AC_SOURCES lines and adding the files
to lib_SOURCES or noinst_HEADERS or EXTRA_DIST. For a .h file it doesn't
matter
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am changing coreutils so that it will use gnulib-tool. As the first
> part of this project I'm installing the following changes into gnulib.
> I've tried to keep the changes "minimal", but that's a relative term
> when talking about a change of this magni
I am changing coreutils so that it will use gnulib-tool. As the first
part of this project I'm installing the following changes into gnulib.
I've tried to keep the changes "minimal", but that's a relative term
when talking about a change of this magnitude. Please let me know if
it causes problems
