* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:24:52PM CEST:
> * Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:01:16AM CEST:
>
> > If there are actual projects that don't use AC_CONFIG_HEADERS then of
> > course we have to be cautious about assuming config-h. But if not,
> > then why wouldn't
[ Adding libtool-patches in the game ]
Hello Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:01:16AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Would anybody object if I changed all the other modules to be
> >> compatible with config-h?
> >
> > This would break lib/argz.c.
>
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> config-h is not the only problem child.
> fnmatch-posix and fnmatch-gnu are documented to collide as well.
That's OK. Part of my motivation for getting rid of "#ifdef
HAVE_CONFIG_H" is to remove unnecessary differences between
gnulib/lib/foo.c and co
Hello Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:40:08PM CEST:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > $ gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=/tmp/testdir `gnulib-tool --list`
> > but this is no longer possible, since the config-h breaks a few other
> > modules.
>
> Would any
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=/tmp/testdir `gnulib-tool --list`
> but this is no longer possible, since the config-h breaks a few other modules.
Would anybody object if I changed all the other modules to be
compatible with config-h? The only do
Earlier it was possible to do
$ gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=/tmp/testdir `gnulib-tool --list`
but this is no longer possible, since the config-h breaks a few other modules.
2006-10-11 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnulib-tool (func_usage): Make module names after --create
