Re: git methodology

2008-01-11 Thread Benoit Sigoure
On Jan 11, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: you will create a new repository. For this purpose, you can have a "gnulib-clean" reposity that only ever contains unmodified gnulib; copying this repository (with "cp -a") is faster than doing a "gnulib clone" across the network. You can

Re: git methodology

2008-01-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > Then the two "git stash" commands were unnecessary; all that's needed is > > > > $ git pull > > # fix conflicts then "git commit" of the merged files > > I vaguely recall that when I've done that in the past, I installed > unnecessary gunk into the savannah rep

Re: git methodology

2008-01-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then the two "git stash" commands were unnecessary; all that's needed is > > $ git pull > # fix conflicts then "git commit" of the merged files I vaguely recall that when I've done that in the past, I installed unnecessary gunk into the sav

Re: git methodology

2008-01-09 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Paul, > > $ git stash > > $ git pull > > $ git stash apply > > # fix conflicts then "git commit" of the merged files > > Alas, the first step doesn't work; git says "No local changes to > save". Then the two "git stash" commands were unnecessary; all that's needed is $ git pu