Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Darn, sorry, I had a rule to remove gnulib's top-level generated lib/
> because it did not contain any source files.
Instead of using the option --source-base=lib or --source-base=gl with a dummy
(otherwise empty) directory, you can also use
--source-base=. --makefile-n
Jim Meyering writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Here is another approach, given that git-version-gen already includes
>> some instructions for things to put in Makefile.am.
>>
>> But maybe there is a better approach, so let's see if we can figure out
>> what makes coreutils include the script in
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Here is another approach, given that git-version-gen already includes
> some instructions for things to put in Makefile.am.
>
> But maybe there is a better approach, so let's see if we can figure out
> what makes coreutils include the script in the tarball...
Hi Simon,
It
Here is another approach, given that git-version-gen already includes
some instructions for things to put in Makefile.am.
But maybe there is a better approach, so let's see if we can figure out
what makes coreutils include the script in the tarball...
/Simon
diff --git a/build-aux/git-version-ge
Eric Blake writes:
> On 04/30/2011 09:53 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I got a report [1] that it wasn't possible to run 'autoreconf' in a
>> distribution tarball because build-aux/git-version-gen was not
>> distributed. Is this intended to work automatically somehow?
>> Otherwise, how about thi
Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> I got a report [1] that it wasn't possible to run 'autoreconf' in a
>> distribution tarball because build-aux/git-version-gen was not
>> distributed.
>
> Can you show such a tarball? In coreutils-8.12.tar.gz,
> build-aux/git-version-gen
> is distributed.
Se
Hi Simon,
> I got a report [1] that it wasn't possible to run 'autoreconf' in a
> distribution tarball because build-aux/git-version-gen was not
> distributed.
Can you show such a tarball? In coreutils-8.12.tar.gz, build-aux/git-version-gen
is distributed.
> > +You must add EXTRA_DIST += build-a
On 04/30/2011 09:53 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I got a report [1] that it wasn't possible to run 'autoreconf' in a
> distribution tarball because build-aux/git-version-gen was not
> distributed. Is this intended to work automatically somehow?
> Otherwise, how about this patch?
>
> /Simon
>
> [
I got a report [1] that it wasn't possible to run 'autoreconf' in a
distribution tarball because build-aux/git-version-gen was not
distributed. Is this intended to work automatically somehow?
Otherwise, how about this patch?
/Simon
[1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/oath-toolkit-help/2011-
