Simon Josefsson wrote:
> This was also discovered while porting GNU SASL to uClinux.
>
> Perhaps I should investigate how difficult it would be to make uClinux
> run ./configure properly instead of maintaining the HAVE_* symbols
> manually.
Definitely. uClinux has a shell and a compilation environ
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> This was also discovered while porting GNU SASL to uClinux.
>>
>> Perhaps I should investigate how difficult it would be to make uClinux
>> run ./configure properly instead of maintaining the HAVE_* symbols
>> manually.
>
> Defin
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> How about this? If for some reason HAVE_DECL_GETLINE is not defined
>> at all, the header file fail to parse.
>
> What's the point in trying to use lib/getline.c without m4/getline.m4 ?
> We engage ourselves to maintain both in
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> How about this? If for some reason HAVE_DECL_GETLINE is not defined
> at all, the header file fail to parse.
What's the point in trying to use lib/getline.c without m4/getline.m4 ?
We engage ourselves to maintain both in sync, since they are part of a
single gnulib module
]>
>
> * getline.h (getline): Protect prototype better.
>
> --- getline.h 17 Jul 2005 11:39:14 +0200 1.16
> +++ getline.h 23 Aug 2005 13:28:13 +0200
> @@ -23,6 +23,6 @@
> # include
> # include
>
> -#if !HAVE_DECL_GETLINE
> +#if defined(HAVE_DECL_GETLINE
]>
>
> * getline.h (getline): Protect prototype better.
>
> --- getline.h 17 Jul 2005 11:39:14 +0200 1.16
> +++ getline.h 23 Aug 2005 13:28:13 +0200
> @@ -23,6 +23,6 @@
> # include
> # include
>
> -#if !HAVE_DECL_GETLINE
> +#if defined(HA
How about this? If for some reason HAVE_DECL_GETLINE is not defined
at all, the header file fail to parse. This uses the idiom that is
suggested by the autoconf manual.
2005-08-23 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* getline.h (getline): Protect prototype better.
--- getline.
