Hi Ed,
> For FreeBSD specifically I'd rather conclude either that this is a bug
> in our localeconv and fix it, or that more than one value for
> l->grouping is permissible and change the test.
Looking at
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap07.html
http://pubs.open
On 1 October 2012 13:48, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Ed Maste wrote:
>
>> On 30 September 2012 17:39, Bruno Haible wrote:
>>> Jim Meyering wrote on 2012-08-28:
FAIL: test-localeconv (exit: 262)
=
test-localeconv.c:41: assertion failed
Ed Maste wrote:
> On 30 September 2012 17:39, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Jim Meyering wrote on 2012-08-28:
>>> FAIL: test-localeconv (exit: 262)
>>> =
>>>
>>> test-localeconv.c:41: assertion failed
>>>
>>> which corresponds to this line:
>>>
>>> $ cat -
On 30 September 2012 17:39, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote on 2012-08-28:
>> FAIL: test-localeconv (exit: 262)
>> =
>>
>> test-localeconv.c:41: assertion failed
>>
>> which corresponds to this line:
>>
>> $ cat -n tests/test-localeconv.c|gr
Jim Meyering wrote on 2012-08-28:
> FAIL: test-localeconv (exit: 262)
> =
>
> test-localeconv.c:41: assertion failed
>
> which corresponds to this line:
>
> $ cat -n tests/test-localeconv.c|grep -B6 41
> 35{
> 36 struct lco
Hi,
Paul Eggert skribis:
> On 08/28/2012 05:13 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Since that same test passes just fine on a Solaris 10 system
>> to which I have access, I'm going to ignore it for now.
>
> The same test also passes on a Solaris 11 system
> that I have access to, so perhaps it's somethin
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 05:13 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Since that same test passes just fine on a Solaris 10 system
>> to which I have access, I'm going to ignore it for now.
>
> The same test also passes on a Solaris 11 system
> that I have access to, so perhaps it's something
> speci
On 08/28/2012 05:13 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Since that same test passes just fine on a Solaris 10 system
> to which I have access, I'm going to ignore it for now.
The same test also passes on a Solaris 11 system
that I have access to, so perhaps it's something
specific to hydra.
I noticed that the autobuilder failed only on solaris:
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/2976390/log/raw
At first, I misdiagnosed it as a failure in another test (but that was
merely a skip), committed the following and immediately reverted it.
From 1c38788efee7ca9afb6d3a857c95dfd1b5f2d03b Mo
