Re: coreutils-8.2 misc/ls-time test failure

2009-12-21 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 12/19/2009 5:34 PM: > Here's what I'm finally pushing to gnulib, and a followup to coreutils. And a followup; now that the test requires inequality in ctime, the nap() function needs to sleep longer when run on ext3 or any o

Re: coreutils-8.2 misc/ls-time test failure

2009-12-19 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 12/17/2009 10:16 PM: > On further investigation, the problem doesn't appear to be quite as > pervasive as I thought. It only happens when mtime is UTIME_OMIT; that > is, when the call is only requesting a change in atime. I

Re: coreutils-8.2 misc/ls-time test failure

2009-12-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > According to Eric Blake on 12/15/2009 7:48 PM: >> According to John Stanley on 12/15/2009 4:42 PM: >>> Basically, what's happening is that 'touch -a ..' updated ctime in >>> coreutils-7.6, >>> but does not update ctime in coreutils-8.2 (hence misc/ls-time fails). >> >> Ouch. Th

Re: coreutils-8.2 misc/ls-time test failure

2009-12-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > [adding bug-gnulib] > > According to Eric Blake on 12/15/2009 7:48 PM: >> According to John Stanley on 12/15/2009 4:42 PM: >>> Basically, what's happening is that 'touch -a ..' updated ctime in >>> coreutils-7.6, >>> but does not update ctime in coreutils-8.2 (hence misc/ls-time

Re: coreutils-8.2 misc/ls-time test failure

2009-12-15 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [adding bug-gnulib] According to Eric Blake on 12/15/2009 7:48 PM: > According to John Stanley on 12/15/2009 4:42 PM: >> Basically, what's happening is that 'touch -a ..' updated ctime in >> coreutils-7.6, >> but does not update ctime in coreutils-8.2