Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Paul Eggert wrote: Matthew Woehlke writes: Perhaps there's a better way. In I asked Matthew Woehlke why the patch was actually needed -- as it's not 100% clear to me -- and that hasn't been followed up on yet. ...it's need

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Perhaps there's a better way. In >> >> I asked Matthew Woehlke why the patch was actually needed -- as it's >> not 100% clear to me -- and that hasn't been followed up on yet. >

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about the following alternative - at configure time, if there is a > mismatch between sizeof(uintmax_t) and sizeof(intmax_t), we redefine these > two types to be the same size as the smaller of the two (effectively > disabling long long on Tandem NSK si

Re: [bug-gnulib] coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Matthew, Paul Eggert wrote: > Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I didn't see this show up on bug-gnulib, nor in the list queue, so I took > > the liberty of resending it... > > > > Original Message > > Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:13:36 -0600 > > From: Matthew Woehlke >

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Paul Eggert on 11/16/2006 11:02 PM: >> Ok. Using the latest snapshot Eric provided me with, m4 fails to build >> on Tandem NSK/OSS. Using the above, *plus* this patch: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-10/msg00140.html >

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I didn't see this show up on bug-gnulib, nor in the list queue, so I took > the liberty of resending it... > > Original Message > Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:13:36 -0600 > From: Matthew Woehlke > ... > Ok. Using the latest snapshot Eric pro

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I didn't see this show up on bug-gnulib, nor in the list queue, so I took the liberty of resending it... - Original Message Subject: Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:13:36 -0600 From: Matthew Woehlk

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Paul Eggert wrote: Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm quite certain I remember it bombing (there are 'unsigned long long's sprinkled in there without it). But I am guessing the problem is just that CVS is a little off of coreutils-6.4, which is what I was trying to patch. I think t

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm quite certain I remember it bombing (there are 'unsigned long > long's sprinkled in there without it). But I am guessing the problem > is just that CVS is a little off of coreutils-6.4, which is what I was > trying to patch. I think the main proble

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FYI: You probably know this, but the patch you pointed me at did not > apply at all (I think one hunk in total went through), so I had to > apply the changes by hand. No, I didn't know that. What happens if you omit that patch entirely? If it works

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

Paul Eggert wrote: Does this include all the patches that have been flying around for NSK? I've been meaning to apply those, but between some in gnulib, some in coreutils, and some that need manual filtering to apply at all, I haven't gotten to it. That release includes a snapshot of gnulib stat

Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)

>> Does this include all the patches that have been flying around for NSK? >> I've been meaning to apply those, but between some in gnulib, some in >> coreutils, and some that need manual filtering to apply at all, I >> haven't gotten to it. > > That release includes a snapshot of gnulib state from