Re: What is the history behind the check-module script?

Hi Collin, > I never looked at the check-module script until now. Was it supposed > to be used as an automatic check to be run before committing or > something? Probably yes. Certainly Jim used it. I don't use it. Bruno

What is the history behind the check-module script?

I never looked at the check-module script until now. Was it supposed to be used as an automatic check to be run before committing or something? I noticed that it doesn't handle conditional dependencies like this: Dependencies: stat[test $NEED_STAT_PLEASE = 1] This

FYI: check-module tweak

There are still plenty of violations, but this removes a few false-positives. * check-module (%exempt_header): Add exception for some conditionally-included headers. Index: check-module === RCS file: /sources/gnulib

FYI: check-module: add at-func.c to white-list

Checking openat produced this: $ cd modules && ../check-module openat check-module: ../lib/openat.c: duplicate inclusion of at-func.c check-module: ../lib/openat.c: duplicate inclusion of at-func.c So I fixed it: * check-module (find_included_lib_files): Add at-func.

cycle-check module typo fix

I installed this, so that findutils would bootstrap: 2006-08-15 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * modules/cycle-check (configure.ac): Add gl_CYCLE_CHECK. --- modules/cycle-check 10 Aug 2006 13:40:17 - 1.6 +++ modules/cycle-check 15 Aug 2006 21:46:42 - @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ sam

Re: check-module

Hello, On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > 2005-07-11 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * check-module: If more parameters are given, check each of them > separately; add more

patch ping: check-module

Hello, about two weeks ago I submitted a patch http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2005-07/msg00084.html I verified that the archive hasn't clobbered it, except the first two lines: 2005-07-11 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Could any of

Re: check-module

Hello, On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:30:32PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > > (cd modules; ../check-module *) ... > There seems to be a portability problem with the check-module script: actually, the script didn't seem to be prepared for such usage at all. It seems that the script ac

Re: check-module

Jim Meyering wrote: > FYI, I ran this command > > (cd modules; ../check-module *) > > and saw some new warnings: There seems to be a portability problem with the check-module script: When I remove all the exceptions code from the check-module script and run (cd modules; ../ch