Re: bug#7529: Bug#605639: deal better with different filesystem timestamp resolutions

2010-12-04 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/03/10 02:03, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Would you mind adding a "Bug fixes" entry for this >> in coreutils' NEWS file? It'd be nice to commit that >> along with an update of the gnulib submodule to the latest. > > Sure, done, with this notice: > > cp -u no longer does u

Re: bug#7529: Bug#605639: deal better with different filesystem timestamp resolutions

2010-12-03 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/03/10 02:03, Jim Meyering wrote: > Would you mind adding a "Bug fixes" entry for this > in coreutils' NEWS file? It'd be nice to commit that > along with an update of the gnulib submodule to the latest. Sure, done, with this notice: cp -u no longer does unnecessary copying merely becaus

Re: bug#7529: Bug#605639: deal better with different filesystem timestamp resolutions

2010-12-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert wrote: > Good eye! Thanks for the bug report and example. I installed > the following one-byte patch into gnulib; please give it a try. > It should propagate into coreutils the next time coreutils > updates from gnulib. > > A test case for this would require two file systems, one with

Re: bug#7529: Bug#605639: deal better with different filesystem timestamp resolutions

2010-12-01 Thread Paul Eggert
Good eye! Thanks for the bug report and example. I installed the following one-byte patch into gnulib; please give it a try. It should propagate into coreutils the next time coreutils updates from gnulib. A test case for this would require two file systems, one with finer-grained time stamps tha