Jim Meyering wrote:
> > OK to commit?
>
> Yes, that looks fine.
Actually MacOS X and OpenBSD now also support the POSIX API (statvfs function).
I've adjusted the comments as below and pushed it.
--- m4/fsusage.m4 2010-07-04 23:44:29.0 +0200
+++ m4/fsusage.m42010-07-04 23:41:11.
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> > Upon inspection, it appears that the fu_cv_sys_stat_statfs2_bsize
>> > test in m4/fsusage.m4 (labelled "AIX") would succeed on
>> > glibc, MacOS X, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Cygwin
>> > ...
>> > without a clear overview of which platform e
Hi Jim,
> > Upon inspection, it appears that the fu_cv_sys_stat_statfs2_bsize
> > test in m4/fsusage.m4 (labelled "AIX") would succeed on
> > glibc, MacOS X, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Cygwin
> > ...
> > without a clear overview of which platform ends up using which code,
> >
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> However, I'm not sure it's portable enough.
>> Do you know when the f_frsize member began to be useful?
>> Without knowing that, I cannot judge whether this introduces
>> a portability problem on older glibc, kernels or file systems.
>
> There are also other platf
Hi Jim,
> However, I'm not sure it's portable enough.
> Do you know when the f_frsize member began to be useful?
> Without knowing that, I cannot judge whether this introduces
> a portability problem on older glibc, kernels or file systems.
There are also other platforms than glibc/Linux.
Upon i
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> > On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> >> Hmm, actually "struct statfs" on linux does have f_frsize, only the
>> >> manpage doesn't document it. So correct thing would be to use that,
>> >> no?
>>
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> Hmm, actually "struct statfs" on linux does have f_frsize, only the
> >> manpage doesn't document it. So correct thing would be to use that,
> >> no?
> >
> > Here's a patch that all
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> Hmm, actually "struct statfs" on linux does have f_frsize, only the
>> manpage doesn't document it. So correct thing would be to use that,
>> no?
>
> Here's a patch that allows df(1) to correctly calculate the disk usage
> and d
