Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 14:48, Gary V. Vaughan a écrit : > The latest version can, however, be dropped directly into the override > directory, and will upgrade itself from changes to the override module > sources: > > ┌─┤gary@anungunrama│~/Devo/libtool--devo--0│master│9f2b41f│ > ├!35

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 17:56, Paul Eggert a écrit : > On 12/28/2012 03:02 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: >> So here is my proposal. > > Looks good to me, thanks. Pushed.

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/28/2012 03:02 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: So here is my proposal. Looks good to me, thanks.

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Salut Akim! On 28 Dec 2012, at 19:22, Akim Demaille wrote: > Le 28 déc. 2012 à 12:39, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit : >> On 28 Dec 2012, at 18:00, Akim Demaille wrote: >>> Can't all these bootstraps be merged? Bison used to have a forked >>> one too, but Joel's and Jim's efforts resulted Bison's u

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 12:39, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit : > On 28 Dec 2012, at 18:00, Akim Demaille wrote: >> Le 28 déc. 2012 à 10:35, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit : >>> Salut Akim! >> >> Hi Gary! Long time no see :) > > Too long! :) Agreed :) >> Can't all these bootstraps be merged? Bison used

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On 28 Dec 2012, at 18:00, Akim Demaille wrote: > Le 28 déc. 2012 à 10:35, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit : >> Salut Akim! > > Hi Gary! Long time no see :) Too long! :) >> My bootstrap rewrite (used by Libtool & Zile among others) has always >> passed any `--force' from it's own command line along

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 27 déc. 2012 à 17:45, Paul Eggert a écrit : > On 12/27/2012 02:25 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: >> Is there a reason not to pass --force? > > I can't think of one. So here is my proposal. The only observed difference is indeed ylwrap. (And the early arrival of 2013 in some copyright notices due

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 10:35, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit : > Salut Akim! Hi Gary! Long time no see :) > My bootstrap rewrite (used by Libtool & Zile among others) has always > passed any `--force' from it's own command line along to all autoreconf > and libtoolize invocations it makes without any p

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-28 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Salut Akim! On 27 Dec 2012, at 17:25, Akim Demaille wrote: > I recently realized that I was stuck with an old ylwrap. I > thought that bootstrap was appropriately upgrading my environment > when a newer Automake was installed, but it is not the case, as > bootstrap reads: > > # Tell autoreconf

Re: bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-27 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/27/2012 02:25 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: Is there a reason not to pass --force? I can't think of one.

bootstrap does not pass --force to autoreconf

2012-12-27 Thread Akim Demaille
Hi friends, I recently realized that I was stuck with an old ylwrap. I thought that bootstrap was appropriately upgrading my environment when a newer Automake was installed, but it is not the case, as bootstrap reads: # Tell autoreconf not to invoke autopoint or libtoolize; they were run above.