Le 20 sept. 2012 à 00:45, Karl Berry a écrit :
> Hi Akim,
Hi!
>I have not received answers on this regard,
>
> I did answer. I replied to bug-automake, which all interested parties
> are on
Actually, I'm not on this list, sorry. The only Autotool list I'm
on is automake-ng.
> (and whi
s.org (Karl Berry)
To: bug-autom...@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bison 2.6.2 contains stale info files
In-Reply-To:
So, Karl, Jim, and others, would you accept that gendocs.sh
stopped generating a compressed tarball of split info files,
but would rather ship a compressed --no-split file?
Well, I
Le 1 sept. 2012 à 17:12, Jim Meyering a écrit :
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> ...
>> So, Karl, Jim, and others, would you accept that gendocs.sh
>> stopped generating a compressed tarball of split info files,
>> but would rather ship a compressed --no-split file?
>
> Sounds fine to me, but gendocs.sh
Akim Demaille wrote:
...
> So, Karl, Jim, and others, would you accept that gendocs.sh
> stopped generating a compressed tarball of split info files,
> but would rather ship a compressed --no-split file?
Sounds fine to me, but gendocs.sh is Karl's baby ;-)
(Karl and Jim, see below about gendocs, Stefano, see below
about Automake-OG).
Hi Peter, hi friends,
Le 6 août 2012 à 11:37, Peter Breitenlohner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> the distributed bison-2.6.2 tarball contains the two stale files
> doc/bison.info-{1,2} from 2.6.1-dirty, and their existence in t
