Eric Blake wrote:
> gnulib-tool --with-tests --test printf-posix
>
> still failed with:
>
> 9,10d8
> FAIL: test-printf-posix.sh
Oops, I forgot to commit a change. Already mentioned in the 2007-04-10
ChangeLog entry.
*** tests/test-printf-posix.h 6 Apr 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 4/11/2007 5:48 PM:
> Can you please test this patch? Already in CVS without testing; I rely on you.
>
> Bruno
>
> 2007-04-11 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * lib/vasnprintf.c (VASNPRINTF): Implement the %F
Eric Blake wrote:
> Up till today, newlib has this bug:
>
> $ printf %.f 1234
> 1234
> $ printf %.F 1234
> 1F+03
>
> basically, it is treating %F like %e, with rather comical results. This bug
> bites cygwin 1.5.x (but not 1.7.0). And printf-posix and friends currently
> do
> not test for it
Up till today, newlib has this bug:
$ printf %.f 1234
1234
$ printf %.F 1234
1F+03
basically, it is treating %F like %e, with rather comical results. This bug
bites cygwin 1.5.x (but not 1.7.0). And printf-posix and friends currently do
not test for it.
--
Eric Blake
