Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> But did you intend to remove 2009 from those
>> two copyright year lists?
>
> Yes, since the two files were not really changed in 2009. A years-old habit
> of mine...
No big deal, but the maintainers guide encourages us to update the
year lists regardle
Jim Meyering wrote:
> But did you intend to remove 2009 from those
> two copyright year lists?
Yes, since the two files were not really changed in 2009. A years-old habit
of mine...
> They look fine.
Tested with gcc 4.3 and 4.2. I pushed it.
Bruno
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> -
>> While looking through gcc's documentation (latest upstream),
>> I noticed this, which can be put to good use in xalloc.h:
>>
>> @item alloc_size
>> @c
Jim Meyering wrote:
> -
> While looking through gcc's documentation (latest upstream),
> I noticed this, which can be put to good use in xalloc.h:
>
> @item alloc_size
> @cindex @code{alloc_size} attribute
> The @
