On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> Bruno Haible wrote:
>>>
>>> Oops, I goofed with "git diff". Here's the correct patch to test.
>>
>>
>> I tried those bench-md5 benchmarks on two platforms, with somewhat more
>> disappoint
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bruno Haible wrote:
>>
>> Oops, I goofed with "git diff". Here's the correct patch to test.
>
>
> I tried those bench-md5 benchmarks on two platforms, with somewhat more
> disappointing results.
>
> I observed a real-time slowdown ranging from 1
Bruno Haible wrote:
Oops, I goofed with "git diff". Here's the correct patch to test.
I tried those bench-md5 benchmarks on two platforms, with somewhat more
disappointing results.
I observed a real-time slowdown ranging from 11% (large buffers) to 22x (small
buffers) on Intel Xeon E3-1225
Matteo Croce wrote:
> I have 55efbb1178e045d52b0f52a2160f3d943c4f8a2c but the patch fails to apply.
Oops, I goofed with "git diff". Here's the correct patch to test.
Bruno
diff --git a/lib/md5.c b/lib/md5.c
index 9b414aa..69240b3 100644
--- a/lib/md5.c
+++ b/lib/md5.c
@@ -221,6 +221,14 @@ process
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Matteo,
>
>> I've checked out latest gnulib, and after double checking that commit
>> 761523ddea70f0456b556c09868910686751fff5 was there I ran this:
>
> Please take commit 55efbb1178e045d52b0f52a2160f3d943c4f8a2c plus the patch
> from https:
Hi Matteo,
> I've checked out latest gnulib, and after double checking that commit
> 761523ddea70f0456b556c09868910686751fff5 was there I ran this:
Please take commit 55efbb1178e045d52b0f52a2160f3d943c4f8a2c plus the patch
from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2018-05/msg00035.html.
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Now, here's a draft patch for adding support for AF_ALG also for the
> sha1_buffer etc. functions.
>
> But I have a problem here: On 4 different systems, I don't get a speedup
> from this patch.
>
> To benchmark it, I use this set of commands:
Now, here's a draft patch for adding support for AF_ALG also for the
sha1_buffer etc. functions.
But I have a problem here: On 4 different systems, I don't get a speedup
from this patch.
To benchmark it, I use this set of commands:
$ ./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=testdir --single-configur
dd ability to use Linux kernel crypto API on data in memory.
* lib/af_alg.h (afalg_buffer): New declaration.
* lib/af_alg.c (afalg_buffer): New function.
diff --git a/lib/af_alg.h b/lib/af_alg.h
index 45c2c12..018fa22 100644
--- a/lib/af_alg.h
+++ b/lib/af_alg.h
@@ -37,6 +37,30 @@
