Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Looks good.
>> You're welcome to commit regardless of the acl_trivial
>> issue mentioned below.
>
> Thanks, applied with a tweak (attached below) that should fix a probable
> breakage on IRIX in the original proposal.
>
>> Once you've
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Looks good.
> You're welcome to commit regardless of the acl_trivial
> issue mentioned below.
Thanks, applied with a tweak (attached below) that should fix a probable
breakage on IRIX in the original proposal.
> Once you've investigated Solaris ACLs you might want to adjust
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here comes the reworked patch for MacOS X 10.5 support in copy_acl, used
> by the 'copy-file' module. With it, now the test passes on MacOS X 10.5,
> and of course still passes on Linux and FreeBSD.
>
> The main difficulty here was to realize that in MacOS
Hi Jim,
Here comes the reworked patch for MacOS X 10.5 support in copy_acl, used
by the 'copy-file' module. With it, now the test passes on MacOS X 10.5,
and of course still passes on Linux and FreeBSD.
The main difficulty here was to realize that in MacOS X, unlike many other
flavors of ACLs, an
