Mark D. Baushke wrote on 2005-12-30:
> For what it may be worth, the CVS project has a
> forked copy of the GNULIB bison.m4 which uses
> bison-missing until such time as automake-1.10 is
> released when it will no longer be an issue.
Which macro is used, depends on whether the generated .c file is
Hi Eric,
Francesco Montorsi on 12/27/2005 11:42 AM wrote:
> PS: I've recently installed SuSE and I've found
> that the configure script of coreutils doesn't
> check for 'bison' presence: on that distro, it
> was missing and it gave me problems later with
> "make". I think adding a check for 'biso
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe bison.m4 should be updated to better check for a new enough
> bison
That might be nice but it's not essential, since the problem is
detected at build time anyway.
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gn
> Eric Blake wrote:
> > Hmmm. m4/getdate.m4 does AC_REQUIRE([gl_BISON]), but m4/bison.m4 DOES
> > blindly use 'bison -y' rather than 'missing bison -y'. Maybe bison.m4
> > should be updated to better check for a new enough bison, perhaps building
> > on autoconf's AC_PROG_YACC or AC_PATH_PROG.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Francesco Montorsi on 12/27/2005 11:42 AM:
>
> PS: I've recently installed SuSE and I've found that the configure
> script of coreutils
> doesn't check for 'bison' presence: on that distro, it was missing and
> it gave me problems
> later
