Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Anyway, I think it should be up to the coreutils maintainers what to do
>>> here.
>>
>> If someone is interested in proposing small patches to coreutils'
>> Make
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway, I think it should be up to the coreutils maintainers what to do
>> here.
>
> If someone is interested in proposing small patches to coreutils'
> Makefile.maint, in an attempt to unify things, without r
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I think it should be up to the coreutils maintainers what to do
> here.
If someone is interested in proposing small patches to coreutils'
Makefile.maint, in an attempt to unify things, without removing
functionality or changing coreutils policy,
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
The second set of patches is against gnulib to remove most of the rules
in coreutils, to avoid duplication. This removes some features from
gnulib's maint.mk, but has any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> The second set of patches is against gnulib to remove most of the rules
>>> in coreutils, to avoid duplication. This removes some features from
>>> gnulib's maint.mk, but has an
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The second set of patches is against gnulib to remove most of the rules
>> in coreutils, to avoid duplication. This removes some features from
>> gnulib's maint.mk, but has anyone been using them heavily? If so, we
>> can add them again by making small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If we make maint.mk minimal, it would be excellent to make coreutils'
>> Makefile.maint do 'include maint.mk'. This was the idea all along.
>> I'll suggest patches for gnulib
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we make maint.mk minimal, it would be excellent to make coreutils'
> Makefile.maint do 'include maint.mk'. This was the idea all along.
> I'll suggest patches for gnulib/coreutils to achieve this.
Below are two set of patches. The first one is ag
