James Youngman wrote:
> > This is a security (mis)feature of HP-UX.
> > I noticed it with closeout-related tests a few years ago.
>
> I believe this anticipates an upcoming POSIX change:
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=173
Thanks for this info. I'm updating the comments:
2011-06-12 Br
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Apparently, although fd 2 was closed in the parent process, it is open again
>> in the child process. This must happen in the exec* calls, since posix_spawn
>
> This is a security (mis)feature of HP-UX.
> I noticed it w
Bruno Haible wrote:
> On HP-UX 11.31, I'm seeing this test failure:
>
> test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion failed
> test-spawn-pipe.sh: iteration 4 failed
> test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion failed
> test-spawn-pipe.sh: iteration 5 failed
> test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion fai
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> On HP-UX 11.31, I'm seeing this test failure:
>
> test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion failed
> test-spawn-pipe.sh: iteration 4 failed
> test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion failed
> test-spawn-pipe.sh: iteration 5 failed
> test-spawn-p
On HP-UX 11.31, I'm seeing this test failure:
test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion failed
test-spawn-pipe.sh: iteration 4 failed
test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion failed
test-spawn-pipe.sh: iteration 5 failed
test-spawn-pipe-child.c:99: assertion failed
test-spawn-pipe.sh: iterati
