On 14-Nov-2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > Would the following patch be OK for recognizing Mercurial in the
| > build-aux/bootstrap script? It seems to work for me. Maybe there is
| > a better way of recognizing that a file is tracked, but I'm not sure
| > what it is.
|
| Ca
John W. Eaton wrote:
> Would the following patch be OK for recognizing Mercurial in the
> build-aux/bootstrap script? It seems to work for me. Maybe there is
> a better way of recognizing that a file is tracked, but I'm not sure
> what it is.
Can you investigate that?
It'd be good to have a defi
Would the following patch be OK for recognizing Mercurial in the
build-aux/bootstrap script? It seems to work for me. Maybe there is
a better way of recognizing that a file is tracked, but I'm not sure
what it is. Unfortunately, "hg status FILE" exits with a status of 0
even when FILE does not e
