Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
>> as far as I can see, no one even uses xreadlink any more, so it's not urgent.
>
> The 'relocatable' facility uses xreadlink.
>
>> However, your point about the "a" vs. "m" prefix is valid,
>> and I've just renamed mreadlink-with-size.
>
> Th
Hello Jim,
> as far as I can see, no one even uses xreadlink any more, so it's not urgent.
The 'relocatable' facility uses xreadlink.
> However, your point about the "a" vs. "m" prefix is valid,
> and I've just renamed mreadlink-with-size.
Thanks. I've got an 'areadlink' module ready now, but I
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I did most of this weeks ago and just noticed I never checked it in.
>> Ok with you, Bruno?
>
> I'll make up my mind on it once you have put an 'mreadlink' module into
> gnulib. I don't see such a module in gnulib, nor in coreutils. Remember
Ha! Good poi
Hi Jim,
> I did most of this weeks ago and just noticed I never checked it in.
> Ok with you, Bruno?
I'll make up my mind on it once you have put an 'mreadlink' module into
gnulib. I don't see such a module in gnulib, nor in coreutils. Remember
that the difference between xreadlink_with_size and
