WOW!
Bruno, that was exactly the issue!
I should've asked you directly before spending hours debugging and
bisecting :)
On 2019-08-24 3:36 p.m., Bruno Haible wrote:
The fact that the error message in both case is "don't know how to make
" perhaps hints there's some common dependency detec
Hi Assaf,
> I'm also struggling with another "bmake" issue relating to automake,
> here: https://lists.gnu.org/r/automake/2019-08/msg0.html
>
> Seems like some recent change in automake broke compilation (of released
> tarballs) with "bmake", while gnu-make still works.
>
> The fact that th
On 2019-08-24 3:08 p.m., Bruno Haible wrote:
Assaf Gordon wrote:
this version of "make" is the native version
(=preinstalled by the operating system) in FreeBSD and NetBSD
So, by improving the support for OpenBSD I regressed on the same
feature in FreeBSD? Ouch.
Somewhat related,
I'm also
Assaf Gordon wrote:
> this version of "make" is the native version
> (=preinstalled by the operating system) in FreeBSD and NetBSD
So, by improving the support for OpenBSD I regressed on the same
feature in FreeBSD? Ouch.
Bruno
Hello Bruno,
On 2019-08-24 2:19 a.m., Bruno Haible wrote:
Perhaps this is a non-issue, and only gnu-make is supported
for this bootstrapping stage (and non-gnu makes are only supported
after "make dist"). Still, worth reporting.
Indeed, we need to distinguish the two uses: Building from a tarb
Hi Assaf,
> Perhaps this is a non-issue, and only gnu-make is supported
> for this bootstrapping stage (and non-gnu makes are only supported
> after "make dist"). Still, worth reporting.
Indeed, we need to distinguish the two uses: Building from a tarball,
and building from a git checkout.
For b
