Re: icc bug on test-frexp-nolibm

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/05/2010 01:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > That is, with no options, icc defaults to -O2. With -g it implies -O0 > which in turn implies -mieee-fp. It is also possible to use -mieee-fp > in isolation, or alongside an explicit -O2. The "bug", then, is that > when optimization is enabled and -mie

Re: icc bug on test-frexp-nolibm

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/03/2010 05:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > I'm running out of time today to get to the bottom of this, so if anyone > else wants to help out, great. If not, I'll see if I can resume testing > tomorrow and get a minimal test case that exposes the compiler bug, as > well as try and isolate ways to

Re: icc bug on test-frexp-nolibm

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/04/2010 11:43 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/03/2010 05:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> I'm running out of time today to get to the bottom of this, so if anyone >> else wants to help out, great. If not, I'll see if I can resume testing >> tomorrow and get a minimal test case that exposes the comp

Re: icc bug on test-frexp-nolibm

2010-11-04 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/03/2010 05:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > I'm running out of time today to get to the bottom of this, so if anyone > else wants to help out, great. If not, I'll see if I can resume testing > tomorrow and get a minimal test case that exposes the compiler bug, as > well as try and isolate ways to