Re: autoreconf is recursive

2006-01-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > Is it really safe to avoid to regenerate in sub-directories? Yes, since they have been generated through func_create_testdir. > I think this should be considered a autoreconf bug and reported > though. ... If so, perhaps autoreconf should have a --no-recursion or > simila

Re: autoreconf is recursive

2006-01-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:20:48PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > It would be nice if you could make the $AUTO* variables overridable on a > > case by case basis. Tools are named differently at places, e.g., > > autoconf25. > > Will this work for the situation that you hav

Re: autoreconf is recursive

2006-01-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon and Paul, > > The func_create_megatestdir part of this patch > > 2004-09-18 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * gnulib-tool: Replace various ad-hoc automake/autoconf/aclocal >

Re: autoreconf is recursive

2006-01-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > It would be nice if you could make the $AUTO* variables overridable on a > case by case basis. Tools are named differently at places, e.g., > autoconf25. Will this work for the situation that you have in mind? Bruno *** gnulib-tool.orig 11 Jan 2006 13:03:25 -

Re: autoreconf is recursive

2006-01-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:48:02PM CET: > *** gnulib-tool.bak 2006-01-07 19:41:07.0 +0100 > --- gnulib-tool 2006-01-08 13:30:35.0 +0100 > *** > *** 35,40 > --- 35,46 > #;; > #esac > > + # You can set AUTOMAKEP