Re: a real fts.c bug + fix

2006-01-12 Thread Paul Eggert
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If any of you know of a system with file name resolution code that > doesn't fail for a chain of 400 symlinks, or for which you get a > different diagnostic than `Too many levels of symbolic links' (ELOOP), > please provide details. On Solaris 8 through

Re: a real fts.c bug + fix

2006-01-12 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> If any of you know of a system with file name resolution code that >> doesn't fail for a chain of 400 symlinks, or for which you get a >> different diagnostic than `Too many levels of symbolic links' (ELOOP), >>